![]() ![]() I think the LS50 Metas could work well with a crossover at 150-200 Hz or so. I would surmise that the R3 has a better mid-bass reproduction than the LS50 for exemple. ![]() It therefore has a tried and tested design, very elegant with its simple and refined silhouette. So I just was looking for confirmation (or not) that my KEF ls50w would not automatically be adding an unwanted high or low pass filter, as again, I’ve never made any prior speaker settings from the KEF app for that speake,r as I’ve never been able to get the app to work. Im thinking about moving from KEF LS50s to KEF R3s if there is something to be gained by doing so. Launched in late 2020, the KEF LS50 Meta is the true heir of the KEF LS50s and shares its design, as do the KEF LS50 Wireless 2 and the small KEF LSX. You mentioned a number of times in the “crib sheet” to be sure if using manual switch on the subwoofer (as opposed to LTE), not to erroneously employ any additional filters in the chain. Setting the crossover at 80hz and the bass volume around 50, this subwoofer added depth. But now with the KC62 subwoofer, that has eliminated the LTE option on the subwoofer, so I went ahead and set up the subwoofer on manual, using the starting point suggested in your crossover “crib sheet”, i.e., low pass 45, high pass 70, and volume at 3 pm. I paired this subwoofer with KEF LS50 Meta and Buchardt S400 MKII. Since I have been using Roon, for the most part successfully, with the KEF ls50w, not having that app functionality has kind of been a non-issue. Despite all efforts and all attempted help by KEF support, I have never got the original Connect app to work with the speaker, and at this point, never expect to. I just got the KC62 subwoofer with KW1 transmitter to add to my original KEF ls50w pair (not the ls50w II). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |